Spare me your ignorance. The summary you gave to your edit had nothing to do with the edit itself. It sounded more like commentary on the scene as a whole. To me, I think it's unclear if he was including himself when he sent the gang to the malt shop; maybe they could have been got him a sandwich, but we don't know that. But you say there's six sandwiches, that's something I'll have to check out.
Edit: The point is, there was two points being made, but inside of rewriting it, you just removed the entire entry.
I get why you would make that assumption and not even need to question, but he didn't say, "Hey, buy each of us a sandwich, on me." Even if he did, he didn't ask for his sandwich to have a scoop of ice cream on his sandwich. We don't know if he has an irregular diet.
That's why it's supposed to be a joke. It's not just Shaggy and Scooby, but someone else. The problem though, was that the page suggested that there should only be five. There really should be six as why would the gang buy themselves one each if he is paying?
Yeah, okay. I still think putting ice cream on the Professor's sandwich (if it was really intended for him, and not one of the burgers) needs to be mentioned as an oddity, though. I don't want you removing the entire entry again, without replacing it with that aforementioned oddity.
I blocked you before because of zero tolerance for unexplained removal (it says that on the right side of the wiki activity list). Yes, it did kind of fit what you were doing, but you removed an entire entry, when there was another point trying to be made, and instead of rewriting it so it would only mention one, you just removed it entirely, which just made it look unhelpful.
I was thinking about just removing the different uses of objects because not only could one object appear in all three subsections, but there's also clues that aren't exactly objects. I don't know if anyone has noticed in the notes/trivia where disguises, how many times "zoinks" is said (and so on) are all listed, but I was thinking of adding it there so all types of clues can be listed.
(Maybe this should've gone in a blog on the main forum, but I hope some of you can give your thoughts on if it should be changed or kept the way it is.)
Hey, I don't know if you want to do this but I noticed not all the episodes from SDMI appear when hovering over SDMI Season 1 & SDMI Season 2 on the wiki navigation. If you want all the episodes up there, use four asterics ***** instead of three***. If that's how you want it, sorry for bothering you; I'm just telling you because it took me a while to figure that out on a wiki I created. Sorry for bothering you!
There are some images on the "Kidnapping Daphne Blake" from Scooby-Doo, Where Are You!, which don't have a description/summary. i think you know what I'm trying to say. I can see you've already started. Don't bother answering.
I think I may have accidentally deleted the picture of Charlie the Robot in Funland. I was trying to delete "needed expansion," and saw the picture was gone. I'm very sorry about that. How do I rectify that mistake?
You know, I was wondering. You said to me you have the Scooby-Doo, Where Are You! DVDs. And every WAY image was taken by you (and all of those images have a Summary and Licensing). But there's one WAY image you probably missed. It wasn't taken by you and it doesn't have a description. I'm talking about the image of Captain Cutler (from "A Clue for Scooby-Doo").
Before you said that, I was thinking of having his picture in his infobox instead. Even though it's a picture, and he has a beard, I thought it'd be good because then there would be a regular and unmasked image.
Yeah, that's fine with me. The painting said "Capt. Cutler", so it's no doubt they're the same person. It's just that I find them a bit different. It could be because it isn't a photo of him, it's just a painting (someone drew it).