I'm not even sure if it's appropriate. I'm mean they're there, and no one's come here to claim ownership, but it does belong to someone else. I think some common courtesy would be nice to get their permission (especially from someone's personal photos, and not some news site).
I don't know the photo you posted, so you'll have to remind me. But what I would like is for on the file page is for there to be a description of what it is, a link, and fairuse tag. The first two should also be on the caption of where it's posted on the Mystery Machine page.
I am the taker, and owner of the posted photo and owner of the van, so permission will be a pretty easy thing to obtain. I believe I uploaded it from a saved copy from my personal facebook page in which I keep photos of my van. I will attempt to remedy the situation on the one photo I posted in the gallery.
Are you reuploading it again? Because you may or not may not have realised that you can't rename your image, as this is only something an admin can do. If you want you can upload a new one, but it'd be easier to go to the existing file and just add the info there and tell me what I should rename it to.
Forgive me for my ignorance, but the photo is in a gallery and I do not know how to apply the Self template a photo in that gallery on that page. I only see a way to apply it to the whole gallery. I have applied the self template and additional information to the file page of the image. If you could, please rename the image to "1967 Dodge A-100 Mystery Machine Van"? I hope the information is adequate and appropriate. Thanks.
You realise I was about to ban you for a very, very long time?
I get that you like him, but it just gets tiresome after a while. Nothing against you, it's just that you can't force people to like something they don't want to. All you can do is just continue to like what you like and find others that have the same interest and talk to them, it's no good trying to find the neysayers that don't care, because in the end you become just as bad as them.
I can't help in getting more DVDs, I don't have control in that department. All you and I can do is spread the word of what is available (like the entire 1st season out on DVD), and hope that it sells well enough for more to be released in season sets.
by the way nice page I like it I want to make a scrappy doo playstation game one day and I want the bad guy to be evil scrappy I sorry for Trolling I made my name scrappy doo because you all ready know why but the 17 and 18 is because I like Android 17 and 18 form Dragonball Z I just don't want to used my Real name online I hope that ok with you
there are many pages of charater that don't in include physical apparence like brad chiles page dont contain his clothes there are many more pages like this so can edit ? and if i can then how can i ? because i am new on wiki and dont know much kindly answer .
sorry about that my Perverting Mistakes I will never uploading any panties images from Episodes on video It's not good for me to upload i got microsoft paint to press the Screen Button when i see panty shot i press the Print Screen for a screenshot
Spare me your ignorance. The summary you gave to your edit had nothing to do with the edit itself. It sounded more like commentary on the scene as a whole. To me, I think it's unclear if he was including himself when he sent the gang to the malt shop; maybe they could have been got him a sandwich, but we don't know that. But you say there's six sandwiches, that's something I'll have to check out.
Edit: The point is, there was two points being made, but inside of rewriting it, you just removed the entire entry.
I get why you would make that assumption and not even need to question, but he didn't say, "Hey, buy each of us a sandwich, on me." Even if he did, he didn't ask for his sandwich to have a scoop of ice cream on his sandwich. We don't know if he has an irregular diet.
That's why it's supposed to be a joke. It's not just Shaggy and Scooby, but someone else. The problem though, was that the page suggested that there should only be five. There really should be six as why would the gang buy themselves one each if he is paying?
Yeah, okay. I still think putting ice cream on the Professor's sandwich (if it was really intended for him, and not one of the burgers) needs to be mentioned as an oddity, though. I don't want you removing the entire entry again, without replacing it with that aforementioned oddity.
I blocked you before because of zero tolerance for unexplained removal (it says that on the right side of the wiki activity list). Yes, it did kind of fit what you were doing, but you removed an entire entry, when there was another point trying to be made, and instead of rewriting it so it would only mention one, you just removed it entirely, which just made it look unhelpful.
Yes, but an oddity is something that doesn't make sense. If there's an easy explanation that makes perfect sense, like the professor getting one of the sandwiches, than it's not an oddity. Thus, this doesn't deserve to be here.
Both of those are going over the top specific. He just asked them to pick up some sandwiches and that he's buy, implying that he would like one too. We don't see him eat the sandwich becuase we don't see anyone eat the sandwiches. The writers made it so that there were six sandwiches and six people, so they wrote it like this. What else needs to be said? This is no more an oddity than seeing a show in which the waiter brings food to a table, but you never hear them ask for it. You just know that one is for him.
I want to apologize for banning you, and coming off rude. It's the way I read your summary, but I think you we're also missing the point of what I'm trying to make about (which was also in that entry you removed). It'd be like asking someone to get you (what you'd think would be) a regular sandwich, and then they come back with ice cream on top. So I think that's questionable.
I was thinking about just removing the different uses of objects because not only could one object appear in all three subsections, but there's also clues that aren't exactly objects. I don't know if anyone has noticed in the notes/trivia where disguises, how many times "zoinks" is said (and so on) are all listed, but I was thinking of adding it there so all types of clues can be listed.
(Maybe this should've gone in a blog on the main forum, but I hope some of you can give your thoughts on if it should be changed or kept the way it is.)
Hey, I don't know if you want to do this but I noticed not all the episodes from SDMI appear when hovering over SDMI Season 1 & SDMI Season 2 on the wiki navigation. If you want all the episodes up there, use four asterics ***** instead of three***. If that's how you want it, sorry for bothering you; I'm just telling you because it took me a while to figure that out on a wiki I created. Sorry for bothering you!