When there are no suspects, you put a bullet point in. I'm not sure if that's necessary. I mean, if there were suspects, they'd be in table form, and not bullet points. But I guess it may look strange saying "None" for no suspects without a bullet point.
When I ask you something are you aware that I actually expect an answer? You've done 16,537 since February 13, 2013 (almost three years) and practically edit every day. Maybe you think you're not required to say anything, and maybe you're right to an extent.
You do quite well, and you follow the most of the changes I make, but there are some changes that you clearly don't seem to want to follow and there's other things you do on your own accord. And that's where the problem comes in. I tell you not to do it, you don't look at your messages and continue to do it, so I have to ban you to get you're attention. It'd be nice for you to immediately check your messages so I don't have to ban you. Whether you like it or not you've made yourself a regular addition to this wiki, and I'm not saying I'm going to give you a promotion or we're going to get into long discussions, but a little interaction would go along way if you could bring yourself to answer me, because to be honest you kind of come of as an automated robot. Communication big or small will help, especially since you regularly edit here. This wiki must mean something for the amount of time you edit here.
Is this something you can do? A yes or no, will suffice.
If you can't answer within the next 24 hours from when this post was made you will be banned permanently. You may think this is unreasonable, but I find your lack of communication as a regular contributer unreasonable. If I do ban you and you return under a different name, I will ban you for evading your ban. I hope for your sake you can reply.
I agree that the one image you removed was out of place without more, but you have to say at least say something along those lines.http://scoobydoo.wikia.com/wiki/Scoobygeist?diff=202202&oldid=201827 Just removing an image without saying something makes it look like vandalism. I've said this before, but you're going to have to be more vocal when involved in a community. You can be silent sure, but you've made many, many edits here, and yet you choose to remain silent. That can only take you so far. I just don't know what I'm getting sometimes, when you don't say anything. I'm not a mind reader. You can't even say ok, or yes, or no. You've spoke before, so I know you're not completely incapable of doing so.
Shouldn't "Clues" be kept as a separate section? There's more significance, for example, of a tuft of fur caught in a wine cask, suction cups or broken contact lenses than a chicken that Scooby eats. Just an opinion..
As I've said before, some users were just looking at the "Clues" part, and not taking into account that it was a part of the objects section. A tunnel is not an object, and I didn't want to have to worry about someone adding that because they couldn't pay enough attention. It seemed like a good, unique idea at the time, but now not so much.
You added "DTVSF" to the appearances section from characters and other subjects adding appearing in the short films. I think from that, we should change, for example, "DTV1" to "DTVF1". What do you think?